Follow the flip.
I attended the most recent citizen lobbying for H.R. 550 last week. I believe that what the bill does right makes it our best hope for election refom: it prohibits undosclosed software, conflicts of interest in machine testing, and prohibits wireless or other communication devices (see the text of 550). I also agree with those who believe that the 2% audit provision needs work.
To begin, I think we can establish that it is safe to call for amendments to HR 550 without endangering the bill. Other ER posters have, rightly, trumpeted, Holt's recent open letter to critics of 550. Here is what he wrote about amendments:
I have been concerned that if election reform activists call for changes, the bill's prospects could diminish. Holt's statement is reasurance that calling for committee markup and then amendments is not going to hurt anything. He's talking here about the sample sixe, but the same principle should apply to other audit amendments.
Follow the flip.
· IA-Gov: GOP rival pins health care reform on Branstad (desmoinesdem)
· Which House Democrat should get Blue America's first endorsement? (desmoinesdem)
· It's Time To Close The Terror Gap (Cliff Schecter)
· "The Conspiracy to Kill the New Deal" (desmoinesdem)
· Blanche Lincoln's website supports public option (desmoinesdem)
· Big Coal's PR Spending Spree (desmoinesdem)
· IA-03: Former college wrestling coach to challenge Boswell (desmoinesdem)
· Tea Baggers Target Gore... (Cliff Schecter)
· Stimulus Watch (Jerome Armstrong)
· CREW seeks ethics inquiry of Bachmann (desmoinesdem)
· Did IRC help? (MN Campaign Report)
· 5 Worst cities for urban youth (desmoinesdem)